Some people would argue that all universities should provide their students a possibility to study any subjects they want, while others would say that they should obtain only skills, such as science and technology, that are more likely to be implemented in future. I believe that we are free to choose any degree that we desire, because all professions are important for financial system.
Some would argue that students can decide their specialization themselves without thinking whether they will be useful for humanity in the future. One reason for this view is that no one has any rights to tell other people what to do and it would be cruel to force students to study subjects they might not be interested in. Another reason is that the freedom of choice in universities creates a diversity on labour market, which has a positive impact on the economy. For instance, western universities allow students to chose subjects from different fields from physics to philology and that helps them to be more educated and certain about their professional future.
On the other hand, restricting the rules by studying only perspective areas related to technology and science, will possibly contribute to technological progress. In addition, there will be no lack of specialists in, for example, IT or engineering, and this fields will probably be developed much more efficient, what is obviously a very valuable investment to the economy of country. To illustrate, in Russia, first education is free in the majority of areas and in perspective ones, there is funding and more study places for students, but there are still a lot of programmes which can be enrolled only by payment.
To sum up, I can understand both sides of discussion, but as a student myself, I think that the freedom of choice in education are important for society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... that are more likely to be implemented in future. I believe that we are free to choose a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons are important for financial system. Some would argue that students can decid...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01639344262 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81156669545 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1426702929 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404115951937 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143752297198 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111337120609 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217598688813 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106303947451 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.