Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, crime information invades in both traditional newspapers and news channels on television. Therefore, there is a fair amount of people believes that it will bring negative impacts to the public and such information should be banned. In my opinion, I totally agree with this argument and this essay will argue why we should restrict crime news.

On the one hand, television channels will face several issues if their programs do not broadcast crime contents. The reason behinds this fact is that crime is one of the main topics of most news channels. Therefore, the channel’s editors and directors need to figure out what contents will replace crime news to full fill their programs. This is a good example to support the idea that newspapers and televisions should not eliminate crime news from their channels.

Despite newspapers and news channels will be affected if crime contents are removed from their channels, I am still in favor of that information have to be banned. The first reason is that giving detailed descriptions of crime leads to fear of crime among the public. According to the current report of the Public Security Ministry in Vietnam, about 50% of people who watch crime news having a fear that they will be attacked while walking in the streets. The second reason is that there is a bunch of subjects and contents that can replace crime information. For example, broadcasters can display either news about well-known people, education, or entertainment, which are extremely attractive people instead of keep sending dangerous news to the public. From those reasons and the realistic example, they should remove crime news from their programs.

In conclusion, this essay argued why crime in the media should be removed. From my sentiment, I totally with this idea to reduce the fear of crime on the residents.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the fear of crime on the residents.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10855263158 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67230817004 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9956187734 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147753404032 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062627946608 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450912818686 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112899117745 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445701899342 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.