Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the hazards in our environment have been gaining a great deal of attention around the world. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding who will be responsible for resolving it. Some experts say, it must be considered globally, while others suggest, only national level activities will be more result-driven. There are strong arguments on both sides, however, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, it must be said that the initiatives from a single country will not help to handle larger aspects. Hence, global giants must sit together to settle this big issue pertaining to our mother planet. Thus, the international organizations may formulate certain common laws and treatise to reduce the burden of pollution generating from large-scale industries. Furthermore, when it comes to awareness, the global presence will make the event more stronger. For this reason, the outcomes will be viral owing to the media interests. For instance, the funding for developing biodegradable shopping bag may contribute in a greater and meaningful way and awareness to reduce plastic use may spread faster.
Conversely, some critics support that the action should be taken from the ground level - from a particular national tire. They consider that the global improvement will be a consequence of successful implementation of strategies at root level. Furthermore, execution attempts at the country level will be prompt as it will face lower extent of red tape of the global politics. In addition, as the budgets are involved, it will be no surprise to see that USA, for example, will not spend on UAE unless they are being benefitted by other political aspects.
All things considered, we are almost on the brink of irreversible damage to our beloved nature. I personally believe, national initiatives should be considered first followed by the international interference where applicable to redress the balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...the global presence will make the event more stronger. For this reason, the outcomes will be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31309904153 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98515706867 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623003194888 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9691899081 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134826623234 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449168813892 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313126482934 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081164291294 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355231405731 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.