Some people think that human needs for farmlands, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view. Why or why not?
In this incessant world of development, psychological evolutions, discoveries, mankind often witness a dilemma. A dilemma which brings the human beings to decide what is more apt and what's not. Making a decision for mankind by the men doesn't give a sweet pie everytime. We all are a part of this very race to make a better decision for the people and the surrounding we reside in.
This has been going on from the beginning of human civilization. As we grew as social beings, our demands started covering broader aspects and we started taking the nature's beautiful gifts trivial. However, these demands were also taken in hand as a pragmatic way for evolution. Little did we knew that what blunders would be made by the men in order to fulfill it's demand. For occurrence of human beings for a safe and sound lifestyle, proper spacing and infrastructure had to brought. As it isn't possible to spend a healthy lifespan yet alone in a forest without shelter, proper storage of food and water. The need for proper manufacturer of goods was reached and this was met by industrialization. All of this demanded deforestation of large hectares of forests to bring land into profitable uses for humans. Development took its way to flourish and mark the definition of a country as an ideal one. Meanwhile, the other innocent organisms lost their habitats to human greed. Displaced by these enormous changes, the earth saw the decline of flora and fauna. Adding to this, the biodiversity and ecological balance has been profoundly dissociated. There have been instances of many animals getting extinct like dodo, the asiatic cheetah. A lot of animals and plants make their entry to the red book, the book of endangered, vulnerable and rare species. If the negative external factors continue destruction, our motive to have sustainable development will not ever be achieved.
To recapitulate, future is unprecedented but we can always try to make it worth living. Every organism on this earth has its own place and we need to embrace the biodiversity that we know. Keeping this in mind, one more thing can justify this, said by the great mahatma gandhi, "there is enough for everyone's need but not for their greed."
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...n beings to decide what is more apt and whats not. Making a decision for mankind by t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aking a decision for mankind by the men doesnt give a sweet pie everytime. We all are ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...nd infrastructure had to brought. As it isnt possible to spend a healthy lifespan ye...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the red book, the book of endangered, vulnerable and rare species. If the nega...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, kind of, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94101876676 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88389615236 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611260053619 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8998943354 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7727272727 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9545454545 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167566525777 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454175919594 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486344194596 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120152530305 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00535037017897 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.