Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinons as thet. Other people believe it's good to have frineds who sometimes disagree with them.Discuss both these views and give your own opinon.

Essay topics:

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinons as thet. Other people believe it's good to have frineds who sometimes disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinon.

It is unquestionable fact that friendship is the greatest relationship among other relations. A school of thought is of the opinion that it is better to make friends with the same nature, whereas others refute it and believe that it is a good idea to have friends who has opposite viewpoints. Both the point of views is discussed further before my inclination.

Among the various thoughts, the foremost one is, people with the same mind-set have strong bonding in relationship. Similarity in the thoughts reduces the conflicts between human connection. For instance, individuals with the same interest of food can enjoy the company to try new taste in various restaurants. Moreover, working person passes their one third time of the day at the workplace and work together with colleagues. As a result individual becomes friends after sometimes. Working with the human who has the same perception improves interest towards work.

However, a group of people has different opinions, to begin with, the friend is one of the closest persons of one and restrict when one doing something unethical. Agree with the person in all the point of views sometime creates hindrance in an individual's life. For instance, if the one decided to occur a crime at that time instead of being a part of that it is a friend's responsibility to restrict from doing that.

In conclusion, I am in the favor of the friends who really care about the person and don't agree on all the view points which are right based on one's point of view. Friends, agree with all opinions may sometimes create more issues in life.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... views sometime creates hindrance in an individuals life. For instance, if the one decided ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friends'' or 'friend's'?
Suggestion: friends'; friend's
...instead of being a part of that it is a friends responsibility to restrict from doing t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ds who really care about the person and dont agree on all the view points which are ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, really, so, third, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7351820507 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3581297686 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6428571429 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215849435022 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713900215885 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622558793837 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13711047554 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660826269274 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.