Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one

Essay topics:

Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?

Mobile phones have become the part and parcel of our lives, especially for youths. A few educational institutes have banned the usage of phones. The essay will discuss the positive aspects of this amendment as it will help the students both in academics as well as in their well-being.
Restricting the use of mobiles in classrooms can improve learning. With the ban on mobile phones, there will be less distraction as a result, students can focus more on their studies. For instance, keeping a mobile phone in the classroom, be it with the teacher or students, the constant urge to check their mobiles will always be there. This kind of distraction could only be removed or reduced to a great extent if phones are banned within the premises.
In addition to this, the constant use of mobile phones makes a child quite addictive and reduces their interest in outdoor activities. It makes them quite dull. They prefer staying indoor and start avoiding playing in the playground during breaks. According to a survey, it has been observed that youngsters of these days are more prone to issues like obesity and depression as compared to adults. Increased use of phones is the main reason behind such kind of issue.
In conclusion, even though mobile phones play a vital role in our lives, I strongly condemn its use in schools. Pupils are not able to focus on their curriculum and it is depleting their health, be it physical or mental. By avoiding phones, students would be able to learn better, will have sound health conditions, and will be able to learn how to be socially interactive.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-09-24 aesha123 73 view
2021-01-15 Haseya 92 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view
2020-11-15 dishanmu 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ill help the students both in academics as well as in their well-being. Restricting the u...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...phones, students would be able to learn better, will have sound health conditions, and...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8315018315 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58008623626 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.296648643 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215618747095 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761928928519 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647185622946 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132310762612 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035499611058 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.