Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers.
Dangerous sports, widely common sports not only between athletes but also ordinary people, should be taken the highly consideration. It is noticed that many people are so attached to some games which are very dangerous. This essay will discuss firstly, some reasons behind people`s addiction to those dangerous sports, and secondly, submitting safety measures and technology ideas which can be taken to avoid its danger as the most viable suggestions.
Several types of sports and athletic games are categorized in the safe zone, but those games which are extremely dangerous seduce the gamer to practice it. Those risky games introduce to the players difference experience of feelings which are very interested to them to feel during the game. For example, a game such as sky diving is extremely risky for those ordinary people; however, they try it on several times to experience the sensation of flying without any limits. Furthermore, some people after the game express that such games allow them to beat their fears and give them the ability to sustain any stresses in life. Needless to say, the danger can be attached to such games; nevertheless, risky games are very important for those players to continue in their lives.
Different measures depending on the kind of the game should be taken by the sports organization which allowing people to play those dangerous games. Minimizing the risk is the first aim; therefore, giving a comprehensive training course by certified trainers is a must for the players. This should be followed by trial sessions by using the cutting-edge technology to test and evaluate people understanding of game rules. For instance, sky diving simulator, a small closed room with big fan on the ground, is now available to test the players and gives them the similar experience before sending them on a plan for the live game. Well-trained players are far from any risk and act with more confidence during their actual sport experience.
To sum up, there are a lot of fans for dangerous games due to several reasons, but with some safety measures and well training, the danger can be eliminated to zero percent. It should be fully monitored by related organization with applying some certain check list before the game.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...g the game. For example, a game such as sky diving is extremely risky for those ordinary p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...kind of the game should be taken by the sports organization which allowing people to p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the players. This should be followed by trial sessions by using the cutting-edg...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is should be followed by trial sessions by using the cutting-edge technology to ...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...erstanding of game rules. For instance, sky diving simulator, a small closed room with big...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10215053763 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67528091827 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1032193871 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234511865053 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922647418987 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513653731941 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163709329641 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037023789337 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.