In the mordern society, team work is a dominant approach to solve problems; whilst, only a minority of work is accomplished solely. Some would argue that team activity proffers more skills for life. However, I disagree with this view. I believe that both group activity and sole activity provide necessary skills for participators.
To begin with, team work teaches people to learn the skills of coopration. By participating in group activity, participators comprehend that a task is so complicate that a team is essential to successfully finish the work. During the period, people learn to succor and encourage each other. Moreover, participators develop their interpersonal skill from group activity. Due to the nature that team members have different personality, participator has to learn these disperate routes to communicate with different person with distinct character. For example, skillful people acknowledge that they must talk affirmtively and seriously with negtive person.
On the other hand, sole work forms self-displine and improve DIY ability. Firstly, one must control himself and avoid disruption from outer environment. For instance, a painter ought to complete a painting with schedual and he has to make a plan and stick to it. Secondly, people are lack of assistance in sole activity so they have to do it themselves. With practice in sole work, an engineer do not need assistant to help with survey, desing and budget. Therefore, sole work also form important skills that are DIY ability and self-control, which are crucial skills for people's life when nobody offers help.
To recaputulate, performing in team activity and sole activity both provides improtant skills for participators. Although team work dominates the work type in present, sole work is also indispensible to accomplish task in certain areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4425087108 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99597272449 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3353559275 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303831240616 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105951087564 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831660602675 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202749087798 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518654191695 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.