In past, tourism was not so much popular in the environment-friendly areas. In recent years, however, the concept of tourism has changed drastically. Many nations are facing environmental issues due to an increase in the trend of tourism. In this essay, I will discuss my partial agreement with the notion that the economy of several countries is lagging far behind because of tourism whereas it generates the revenue income for the government as well.
On the one side, there are numerous reasons why tourism is important for any nation. Firstly, it provides the job opportunities to the low or middle-class people. In other words, when the tourists visit a local area, then they most of the time, show their interest in the handicrafts which directly increases the small-scale business. As a result, flow of foreign currency is increasing, resulting in the strong economy. Secondly, it generates handsome revenue income for the government. Moreover, the government is earning by imposing heavy excise duty on the local products.
On the other side, it goes without saying that no rose without thrones. We are creating several problems to our Mother Nature by advancing the tourism. For instance, we are cutting the trees to build hotels at the tourist spots which is causing environmental damage. A recent survey conducted by IIT Delhi reveals that most of the tourist places are running out of natural resources because of overuse.
In conclusion, tourism has its own paramount importance in the growth of any country. However, it is the responsibility of the government that they should spend a big amount of money on the tourist sites to improve the infrastructure and maintain the identity of their country otherwise it will get lost in the oblivion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
In past, tourism was not so much popular in the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11805555556 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93426404374 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8132303146 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991333250495 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295476221378 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229957385279 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549889270147 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274378914859 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.