Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Thanks to the development of economy and culture, a growing number of educational approaches have occurred. Some people claim that ask children to work in the small group is the best way to educate children. However, from my perspective, I do not agree with the statement.
Admittedly, asking children to work in the group sometimes can enable children to accomplish the goal effectively. To be more concrete, working in the group means there are co-workers, who can express their perspectives respectively. They can use a brainstorm in the group, which can offer different ideas and resolutions of the problems from different angles and can help the children achieve the assignments more quickly. If make the children face the problems dependently, they may get stuck in the plights or the predicaments because they are limited by the thinking.
However, making the children study individually can let them find their learning pace, which is of importance for teaching children. To be more specific, studying individually means children can have a tranquil learning environment. There is no need to keep pace with the whole group, and they can arrange their schedules by themselves, such as how much time they want to spend on math- learning, how many English words and grammars they want to have a grasp of today. This can help them achieve the self-orientation and make progress more quickly. So, letting children work individually can sometimes be more beneficial to children than let them working in the small group.
Furthermore, making the children study individually can cultivate their ability of independence. Modern education is not supposed to only attach importance to the grades. The capacity of independence should also be taken into consideration, because independence is the thing which everyone will face with and it can also contribute to a person's success. The age of the children is the best age of cultivating this skill. For example, my cousin, who is 10 years old, was highly independent now. Because his teacher implemented such an independent education model in his class. The teacher let him make the schedule by himself and do a summary about what he had learned each day and so on. As a result, the students in the class, including my cousin, are more independent than other classes in the school. The grades and other abilities of them are also preeminent.
To put it in a nutshell, although asking children work in the small group can help them complete goal quickly to some extent, in the long term, making children study independently can be more of benefit for children which involves cultivation of abilities of self-orientation and independence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ce with and it can also contribute to a persons success. The age of the children is the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... years old, was highly independent now. Because his teacher implemented such an indepen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14123006834 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00022397692 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487471526196 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.170543765 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.590909091 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59090909091 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245814139479 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845092812155 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115861138162 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174967783329 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688410055415 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.