correct teacher s mistake

Essay topics:

correct teacher's mistake

It’s believed that people will never be perfect. They may sometimes make some mistakes. Same as the situation of the teacher in class. Teachers will inevitably say something incorrect, and I’ve encountered such a situation several times. From my personal experience, I will raise my hand to inform teachers of the mistakes right away.
To begin with, mistakes made by teachers have the chance to mislead and interfere with the contents of the lecture. When teachers are teaching something important, it’s necessary to convey accurate information. Something incorrect might result in students’ misunderstanding, posing a negative impact on their studies. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in college, my calculus professor once made a mistake regarding a fundamental definition in a class. I noticed that mistake since it didn’t correspond to my textbook. Thus, some classmates and I instantly raised our hands to tell the professor. To my surprise, my professor inferred that fortunately, we had informed him of this mistake, otherwise we might have problems in the subsequent lecture. Accordingly, I believe that we should immediately let teachers know the mistakes they make during the lecture.
Second, there is a chance that not all students or classmates will notice the mistakes. Therefore, the corrections will not only inform the teachers but call attention to our classmates as well, reminding them to be careful. In the above-mentioned example, some students in the class didn’t be aware of the mistake immediately. If there wasn’t any student that raised their hands to notify the professor, they might not notice the mistake at all, causing them to absorb the wrong knowledge. As a result, in my opinion, teacher and students can both benefit from immediate error-correcting and thus have a better learning environment.
To summarize, from what I’ve mentioned above, we must let the teachers know their mistakes immediately to prevent the inaccuracy of learning and create an effective learning environment.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-28 Allenwlh 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40432098765 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07522042189 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4615002249 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.55 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331473952374 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937855908596 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779462530793 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200076397153 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372729956541 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40432098765 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07522042189 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4615002249 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.55 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331473952374 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937855908596 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779462530793 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200076397153 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372729956541 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.