Do you agree or disagree? Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children.
Since the dawn of civilization humankind have always worked and collaborated with others in a group to reach his objectives. People who were able to work in a group with others has a higher chance of success since, most of the huge breakthroughs in history are made by people who worked as a team. One of controversial questions regarding this matter is whether asking children to work in a group is the best way to teach young children. Although some people might disagree with this statement, I contend it is not only beneficial but also essential for young children to work in a group. In the following, I will describe most significant reasons supporting my viewpoint.
The first reason to be mentioned is that children in young age learn very quickly. It is showed in many surveys that children’s learning ability is much higher compared to the adults. Especially, in social subjects they can learn very quickly and imitate the behavior. So teaching children to how be part of a group and get along with others can have an enormous effect in children’s future success. By this means children learn how to act as a member of group and do their part. If people do not learn being a part of group as a child, it will be exhausting to learn it in the adulthood since human’s ability to change decreases by aging.
The second reason is that working in a group boosts children’s confidence and social skills. Children learn to raise their questions and speak out themselves in a group, which increases their self-esteem. In addition, children learn to have patience and solve problem for, problems and disagreements rises in every group. The young children can also build a strong base for social skills by interacting with their groupmates. As we all know soft skills play a crucial role in one’s success and children who learn it as a kid will become more successful.
The last but not the least reason is, team work is key to success in almost every field. Scholars have always emphasized it as a key factor in huge successes. It is obvious that a person alone can not achieve as much a team can get. A team can use talents of members as a benefit to make breakthroughs in every field. As long as members of a team are in harmony achieving success seems very easy. But same as other skills being a team player is a skill which can be learned.
So to wrap it up, children’s learning ability is surprising in the young ages so they will learn how to be a team player very quickly. This will help children in their future since, they will build high self-esteem and a strong ground-base for social skills. Also being a team player increases their chance of being successful in their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to be'.
Suggestion: to be
...d do their part. If people do not learn being a part of group as a child, it will be ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t to make breakthroughs in every field. As long as members of a team are in harmon...
^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...a strong ground-base for social skills. Also being a team player increases their cha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70292887029 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78131289246 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441422594142 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5335470271 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.92 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.12 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288859350141 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911889059059 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104994519595 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168541678398 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112984295939 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.