Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people want to fully enjoy their vacations, they should leave their cellphones home.
With the advancement of living standard, more and more people travel to many places of interest when they are freed from work or study. During their travels, cellphones play an indispensable part. So, people cannot enjoy their vacations without their cellphones.
First of all, mobile phones can keep us in contact with other companions when travelling. There are often some urgent occasions in our trips, so at this time we need the assistance of cellphones. For instance, several years ago my friends and I went to Hainan Island over the summer break. Before starting our trip, we had found a tour guide in Hainan who promised to pick us up from the airport and to drop us off at the hotel. Once we landed, we made a call with him immediately and finally he successfully finished the task. Furthermore, Hainan Island is not like some big cities like Shanghai which has well-developed metro system and is full of natural senses. Because of this, sightseers are likely to get lost in the way. When people get lost, they can only rely on their cellphones to ask for help. Therefore, during our vacations mobile phones can help us a lot in some necessary occasions.
Secondly, we can know a new place thoroughly through using cellphones. When arriving in a new place, we do not know too much about the local culture such as food. For example, my classmate and I visited Shanghai last year. At noon one day, we decided to have lunch on East Nanjing Road but we did not know which restaurant is worthwhile. Afterwards, we used APPs on cellphone to find the most well-known restaurants nearby. Through APPs we can also see many comments from customers whatever good or bad. Thanks to cellphone, we had dons some researches on the local food for a few minutes and quickly found the distinctive restaurant. As we expected, the food was tasty and the price reasonable. Without mobile phones, we might not have found such delicious and inexpensive food. Thus, cellphones can bring us a pretty wonderful experience in a new place.
Admittedly, cellphones do have some negative effects on our vacations. Some people may be addicted to their virtual world and neglect opportunities of face-to-face communication with their travel companions. However, travelling outside is not like sitting in the office. People spend most of their time walking or even climbing. If people are travelling while playing their mobile phones, they must pay attention to the surroundings in order to prevent them from tumbling. So, those who are immersed in cellphones do not have many opportunities to have enough fun from their cellphones and not play them for a long time. Therefore, even though people bring cellphones with them, cellphones do not have too much bad influence on people.
Based on several reasonings, cellphones are an indispensable tool for our vacations and indeed help us substantially.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96900826446 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8045913002 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543388429752 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.009979126 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193944766505 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557118548368 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070903537778 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126133240436 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109180186331 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.