Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Submitted by moslem69 on Sat, 02/15/2020 - 13:21

family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Enjoying and being satisfied from job is one of the most critical concerns of the modern society, recently. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that work half a week for long hours has numerous and valuable advantages for society. On the other extreme of the rope, others think work all of the day for shorter hours having a lot of free time to do family work. While two groups take their positions, personally speaking, I believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my point view.

family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">As the first and paramount reason, work some days for long time has direct and considerable impacts on the people’s morale. In others words, working on a few days can help them to pay more attention the family and bring more happiness. And that makes them perfect when they are at work and doing their job well. For instance, empirical research conducted by some master students at many universities shows when morale people are good, they can concentrate on their task and duties remarkably. As a matter of fact, they also strengthen their minds and obtain more positive energy encouraging them to deal with unprecedented challenges and any different problem in life enthusiastically. Therefore, the more time a person spends with his or her family, the more efficient and high-performance in work.

family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">The second reason is that, when people work only three days a week, it can reduce traffic and air pollution. To shed more light on this matter, since labor go work every day, the car is used by them and this will increase the traffic on the streets. A significant example that strikes in my mind in about my experience. when I was student, not only was I late to school, but also punished for traffic. also, I had difficulty breathing during the days due to air pollution. Thus, air pollution and high traffic have bad impact on people’s lives and they can’t do well daily chores. Hence, if people worked three days a week, they would have healthier life.

family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">To wrap it up, all the afore mentioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that work in half a week with long hours allows people to have a good mood. Moreover, alleviate air pollution and traffic and people can do better work.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Family
family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-imag...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 529, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... extreme of the rope, others think work all of the day for shorter hours having a lot of f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Family
...my reasons to justify my point view. family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-imag...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1035, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efficient and high-performance in work. family: Helvetica, sans-serif; backgroun...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Family
...ent and high-performance in work. family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-imag...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ikes in my mind in about my experience. when I was student, not only was I late to s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... school, but also punished for traffic. also, I had difficulty breathing during the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Family
...eek, they would have healthier life. family: Helvetica, sans-serif; background-imag...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99128540305 4.8611393121 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.27931190532 2.67179642975 160% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.199940019 48.9658058833 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.5 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.95 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169126210453 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811847763136 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715908502874 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134692927805 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035171274796 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 10.9000537634 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.