Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to to support your answer.
Communication is one of the main important part of the human-being life. If people do not have contacts with other society member, their life is like a life in a cave. I think friends play the most important role in our social life. We spend our funny moments with our friends, and the friends are our patient stone in hard times. Most of us have some friends who we know them from childhood. For instance we were together from primary school. Also, some of our friendships are from our adulthood. For example friends from military service. A controversial question which is often raised is that which of the friendships is better. Some people states that old friends are more important, however, another have the view that the age of a relationship is not the most important part of it. I personally contend that the latter is true. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that we change during the time. Our beliefs and our values is being changed due to age increase. At the younger ages we found our friends with some common points which are not valuable for us today. Some of them might completely contradicts from the past. This matter would make an obvious difference between us and our friends. For example, I have a friend named Ali, we were friends together when we were ten years old. We were friends because we were teammates in our school's football team. We were always together, we study together, also, after the school, and we talk together about an hour by telephone. After graduation Ali went to the Cadet to be a policeman, and I studied engineering. When he became a police officer, he became a pro-government. But I am truly in the opposite site. Through this difference now we are completely separate.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that expanding our friendship will develop our relationships in the society. When we have some other friends in the other part of the community, we will gain more profits from the whole society. For instance, when I was at the military service I became friends with a police officer who works is the monitoring center named Majid. 3 days ago, when my car was stolen, I called him and he checked the urban cameras. We easily recognized the thief and arrest him. So, if I had not this friend, I had to go to the court, submit a complaint. This process takes 3 months approximately, and the thief was probably fleeing.
In conclusion, although our old friends are more reliable due to our long-term cognition of them, the new friends might sometimes have more benefits for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...n he became a police officer, he became a pro-government. But I am truly in the opposite site. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73535791757 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65135736725 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501084598698 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8218165428 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.21875 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.40625 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149040856965 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404065087288 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479918034121 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11590406708 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434504694653 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.