Without a shadow of a doubt, governments play a pivotal role in the advancement of technology. An unanswered question in this area is whether it is valuable that governments provide considerable budgets for space research. Although some arguments assert that it is economically shortsighted that governments spend excessive money on space missions, I believe otherwise, maintaining investment in space-related research is not squandering money. In the following essay, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that the enhancement of space technology improves our lives. Throughout humankind’s history, the night sky and astronomical events have been in the limelight, so some theories having proposed by gifted individuals. Consequently, pushing the boundary of space science gives rise to employ them in our daily lives. For instance, if not for understanding the law of gravitation force, we would not have placed artificial satellites in orbit and utilized them in weather monitoring, communication, and navigation, to name but a few. Similarly, had scientists not comprehended the nature of solar energy, the nuclear energy whereby the electricity is generated would not have been studied. Therefore, it is plausible that governments allocate money for the space fields due to their application.
Another motive to be mentioned is sooner or later earth will not be suitable for living. Given climate change and other known and unknown reasons, the fauna and flora of our planet have experienced some drastic extinction so far. Accordingly, we should consider some practical alternatives and solutions to prevent similar incidents that threaten human life. Space exploration is a promising step toward saving us from either natural or anthropogenic threats. These researches not only forecast these natural hazards, but we would also discover planets like our earth and possible way to travel them. Furthermore, spacecraft will be helpful to bring resources from outer space if we confront the resource deficiency.
Reflecting upon the grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes that governments should spare no expense in conducting space researches and begrudge any penny spent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6472303207 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15141874895 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6472303207 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8949432317 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.941176471 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194314039155 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595071599357 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549113296986 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113893793835 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477872781846 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.01818996416 131% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.