Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it's better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a sense of humor?
There are some moot points about the characteristics of friends. The question of whether it is better to have a friend who is intelligent or have a friend who is humor has aroused as a subject of controversy among people. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position I strongly subscribe to the point that it is better to have a friend who is intelligent. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be expounded in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that one of the most noteworthy characteristics of human is intelligence. Due to this aspect, people can fulfill everything better, therefore, if everyone has a friend who is smart, he or she can exploit from this quality. To be more specific, intelligent person can help us to choose the best solution when we face problems. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student in university, I had a friend who was very ingenious. Due to this feature, he helped me very much. When I had the last research project I stack in arduous condition and I could not select the best subject for my project. Owing to had an intelligence friend who considered everything he suggested me to choose a subject which will practical for me in the future. I used his help and selected the best subject for my thesis project and because of this subject, I published some article in the best journals. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that intelligent friends can be beneficial for everyone.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned is that smart people have great vision, due to this feature they can show us best horizon, as a result, this kind of individuals can help us to choose the best horizon. My personal experience demonstrates this reality. When I was a high school student I had a friend who was very intelligent and sagacious about everything. Choosing a major for the university was One of the most significant activities in that period for all students. I suspected about my major and could not select the best one. My smart friend inquired about my hobby and other characteristics which were important for chose a major and finally suggested me to select civil engineering because I was strong in math and geology. His advice was very lucrative for me and lead to following success for me. My personal example shed some light to the point that intelligent friend is very important for everyone and it is necessary for us to make a friendship with this kind of people.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that it is very crucial for everyone to has an intelligent friend because these kinds of a person not only help us to cope with the problem easily but also show the best horizon to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...s about the characteristics of friends. The question of whether it is better to have a friend who is in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ople. Everyone has their own zeitgeist. When it comes to my position I strongly subs...
^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'us the best'.
Suggestion: us the best
...sion, due to this feature they can show us best horizon, as a result, this kind of indi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, therefore, kind of, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68089430894 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86826788123 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432926829268 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1958191343 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.130434783 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3913043478 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155830429511 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470944701549 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580901983901 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113485627431 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390940310206 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.