Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
We are living a world which is really demanding about the people. A lot of people on this planet are living in a difficult situations and there are also a lot of people who are struglling for their basic needs. Are the prople helping each other? I think it is much more important to help other people as a fundamental feature of human beings in this world. Fortunately, I am happy that our generation are doing good on that mentioned duty.
To begin with, nowadays people are more aware of the poor people because the media play an effective role in that. While in the past, the only way to know about the poor people was to personally go to their district or hometown, nowadayas it has been changed. the For example, in our city, all of the newspapers have daily news or reports from the status of the low-income people of the city. This makes people hear and know more about the poor people. If high-income people see poor people more often, they will be more influenced by the difficulties poor people face. As a result, they will be more inclined to help them.
Secondly, the science has been instrumental in making people aware about the necessity of helping poor people. Economics is a science about variations in incomes of different people. It has been proves that there are always some people in any society that can not make a living because of several internal and external resaons. Thus other people should support the ones who are trying to keep themselves alive. In addition, the people have understood that they may also turn to be the poor of the city one day and there is nothing certain about themselves. There they think it is better to help poor people and also want others to help them.
Finally, the development of the countries has made people to have more than what they need. People who have good income can always spend on the goods easily even they are not much demanded. Consequently, this will provide some extra good to be given to others.
In summary, taking into account all the reasons described, peope are more encouraged to help other people. Personally, I think we should do the same and also invite our friends and relatives to help as much as they can. At the end, it is good to ask again ourselves that isn't it the thing that whole life is about?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ions and there are also a lot of people who are struglling for their basic needs. Are t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ometown, nowadayas it has been changed. the For example, in our city, all of the n...
^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...town, nowadayas it has been changed. the For example, in our city, all of the new...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...changed. the For example, in our city, all of the newspapers have daily news or reports f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... several internal and external resaons. Thus other people should support the ones wh...
^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... it is good to ask again ourselves that isnt it the thing that whole life is about?
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in summary, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57766990291 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36703628586 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483009708738 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8759332072 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9130434783 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34529131052 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10868041226 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759725907292 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196100029476 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743410246494 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.