Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Undoubtedly, due to a significant increase in social and economic gap between people, the number of people with hard economic sitution has increased in comparison with past decades. In this regard, the people who are provided with enough sources in life and do not have economic problems, play a vital role to reduce the challenges poor people may face. Although some may believe people in the past were more willing to help others by giving them some goods, I personally believe that, in the present era, people tend to help the others more than before. I am going to claify my statement in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, rapid increase in availability of the internet has caused people to help others more than before. In fact, today, people are more aware of the others' difficulties by using different sources of news. A variety of news outlets that people may access every day helps them to know that there are many poor people in the society. On the other hand, in the past decades, due to the lack of news sources, people were unconcious about others challenges in life. Thus, nowadays, when people see that there are numerous people who need their help may be emotionally motivated to help them with feeding them or giving them clothes. For example, some days ago, in their class Whatsapp group, my sister found out that her former classmate is in bad situation and needs urgent money. So, together with her classmates, started to raise funds for her and solved her problems. Had they not access to the internet, they would have not been aware of their friend's problem.
Moreover, in compare to past decades, charities are now more widespread and encourage people to bestow money and goods to poor people. In fact, nowadays, charities test different ways of absorbing people which are really effective. One of the methods by which charities convince people to help others is in person speaking. While walking on the street, the charity representators show up and start to present their charity, their goal ,and their beneficiaries. Thus, more people are willing to help poor people. Furthermore, many charities make advertisements about their organizations on TV. Thus, people are more encouraged to help poor people. For example, there is a charity which rises fund and goods for students who are not able to afford their essential needs for school. They introduced their organization through a TV show. After that, numerous people were called that show to help them with giving money and other valuable things. Thus, in many aspects, the appearance of charities has brought about a willing for people to help others.
To sum up, I am strongly convinced that people are more interested in helping other than before, not only because they are provided with a variety of news outlets that make them more concious about poor people, but also because the charities encourage them to help other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...art to present their charity, their goal ,and their beneficiaries. Thus, more peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94715447154 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50652199704 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455284552846 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6695563708 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.416666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425661029656 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136027720535 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805979499866 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287973084359 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059859051032 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.