Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Patience is usually not a good strategy; we should take action now rather than later. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people think that patience is not a good strategy and people should take action immediately instead of procrastinating all the time, while others disagree. For me, I agree that people should be patient and take action now rather than later. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, a good strategy makes people acquire new knowledge, and patience can make people learn a lot of things. For instance, when I was taking a course called Computer Security at my university, the professor required us to read more than 40 cybersecurity-related papers at the beginning of the semester. Nonetheless, after I was assigned the requirement, I spent more than 6 hours per day pouring over these procure and unfathomable thesis. Eventually, I learned how to spot weaknesses and exploit vulnerabilities when machines are running out-of-date software. On the other hand, I knew that my friend, Todd, decided not to participate in the class after hearing the requirement due to his impatience. Therefore, even though Todd was interested in cybersecurity, his impatient attitude made him lose a great chance of learning his favorite knowledge. So according to my experience, patience is indeed a powerful strategy, and taking action right away made me procure a significant amount of new knowledge and skills.
In addition, a good strategy should make people efficient in their work, and patience can undoubtedly make people concentrate. Take my cousin as an example. My cousin worked in a financial company, and he was an extremely patient person. To elaborate, his boss usually gave him three weeks to conduct his research on customer behaviors. Nonetheless, he always started to do his work right after his supervisors gave him a task. When he encountered difficulties like forgetting which functions to call in Excel, he was patient enough to look for a single function online using more than 2 hours. Therefore, his perseverance made him concentrate on his task and made him extraordinarily efficient in his work. That is, he could often complete his analysis tasks in less than three days. Contrarily, my sister also worked in a financial firm, but she tended to take action later instead of immediately. More precisely, my sister's supervisor frequently assigned her data-analysis-related problems. Yet, she often began to gather customers' data several weeks after she received her mission. Since my sister usually started late on her tasks, she often spent more than two months finishing her assignments.
In conclusion, I maintain that patience is a wonderful strategy and we should take action as soon as possible considering my points mentioned above. Of course, there are benefits to taking steps later. Nonetheless, I believe that my reasons are more compelling and persuasive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24161073826 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15426721737 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3147140859 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.72 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.88 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191620178308 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581355893492 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066375074293 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159870605621 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08340587958 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.