In such a civilized society, in spite of several disagreements people have in various areas so far as one’s view goes, one point that virtually everybody approves upon is the importance of find solutions for main problems. This is mostly owing to the fact that without detecting a solution, these problems can grow gradually and become more dangerous and detrimental in the future. With this in mind, a broad range of controversial attitudes might stimulate a heated debate as what is the best way to overcome these kinds of problems. Two ideas often form in this regard those who trust that they can solve these problems on their own or assistance of other persons. While other thinks government support can be very helpful too. I personally consider myself among the last group. Among the many reasons one can give, two conspicuous reasons will be elaborated through ensuing lines.
The first and important reason which comes to the mind is that some specific problems need a huge amount of money and peoples do not have the ability to overcome these problems. For example, environmental issues such as air pollution or contamination of rivers can be put on this cluster. By allocation of some budget by governments, it is possible to charge private companies to find some practical strategies in order to reduce the influences of these problems in society. Also, it should not be denied that people have another significant role in this regard but, the assistance of governments can solve these problems at a high speed. For example, according to the mentioned problems, it is the government responsibility to increase and improve public transportation system to encourage people to use them and thus reduce the air pollution.
Another important point which deserves some words here is that people usually do not know the process of solving the problems. In such cases, the governments play an important role by increasing the knowledge of people. For example, in the same example, a vast majority of people in my country assemble together in order to clean the nature from the garbage and accumulate them in a specific location to burn every month. But, they are not aware of the consequences of this phenomenon. By burning these garbage, a huge amount of toxic gasses are released into the atmosphere. In this situation, the government can hire additional labors to gather them and bury in a predefined area instead of burning them or introduce other alternative strategies for people.
In conclusion, there are numerous reasons which can be persuasive enough in this regard. Based on the given reasons, I highly suggest that governments should pay more attention to society’s problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In such a civilized society, in spite of...
^^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir own or assistance of other persons. While other thinks government support can be ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 498, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this garbage' or 'these garbages'?
Suggestion: this garbage; these garbages
...equences of this phenomenon. By burning these garbage, a huge amount of toxic gasses are rele...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10112359551 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84786934445 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537078651685 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9857578153 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232558426948 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621623578977 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403823433061 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131676423181 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414834637197 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.