Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Every society has rules to follow and it makes society better for living. Children should be taught to follow the rules from the younger days itself. Some might agree on the idea that rules for children in society are too strict to follow and obey, while in my opinion, I disagree with the statement because of the reasons I will analyze in the following passages.
First of all, rules assist children in spending time wisely and sets up a bar of limitations. What I mean is that without the rules, it is difficult to manage young children and since children have no limitations, they would do things that give them happiness. Therefore, it's the parent's duty to set up the rules for children. For instance, my younger brother is just six years old, he's so fond of playing games and watching youtube on a mobile phone. He spends all his leisure time on the phone instead of playing outdoor and doing his homework. Hence, my parents have set up rules for him, that allows him to watch videos and play games only on Sunday. This helps him spending his time wisely and this example of my brother demonstrates the advantages of setting up the rules for younger children. Research by NYU revealed that adults who have followed rules by parents when they are kids have made a better future than those who do not.
Secondly, rules can help teach younger children to grow into better human and understand the real world. In other words, rules imposed on children since their childhood can be helpful for them to face lesser problems when they grow up. Rules such as respecting elders, talking properly with respect to others or elders can all help them when they grow up as it will grow with them as their habits. Parents should teach basic rules to their children. For example, when I was seven years old, my parents made a rule for me to talk to my elders with respect. Before that, I used to be very rude to my nanny and never used to listen to her. I used to compel her most of the time, so my mother set up the rules for me to be nice and respectful to her and others. And this has taught me to be a good human being and to give respect to elders. This example of myself illustrates the way the rule has improved my life to become a better human being.
In conclusion, because the rules can help children spend time wisely and because it can build children into a better human being hence, I agree with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...gs that give them happiness. Therefore, its the parents duty to set up the rules fo...
^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
... younger brother is just six years old, hes so fond of playing games and watching y...
^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[8]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to spend' or 'spend'.
Suggestion: to spend; spend
...ay games only on Sunday. This helps him spending his time wisely and this example of my ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4762979684 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23721961788 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465011286682 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2945156086 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184964577462 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660059790053 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078777278784 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150527160182 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1207001452 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.