Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The second reading of a book is more interesting than the first reading.
Reading experiences have been an appealing topic in our modern society. Readers nowadays widely argue that it is more exciting to read the book again than it is to read at the first attempt. In my personal viewpoint, I approve of this argument.
In the first place, what I put in my priority is deep understanding. It cannot be denied that, when reading books for the second time, people tend to understand the stories quite well. As a result, they are likely to pay more attention to details, thereby realizing some details that did not notice in the first time reading. In fact, in stories, such small details may contain some important meaning, potently affect the whole contexts. Therefore, as they read stories again, people are able to understand the book more thoroughly. More importantly, the second reading is certain to bring connection between ideas in the book. Instantly, in the first attempt to read the stories, people tend to have some details that seem to be irrelevant to each others. However, when they master the content of the stories, these details are bound to link tightly together. As a consequence, this enables to construe the stories entirely. With no doubt, the more people read books, the better and deeper they could master them.
In the second place, personal enjoyment holds no less importance. The fact is that the second reading a book brings us different experiences from the first time reading it. For instance, while reading a book for the first time, people tend to be very intrigued in the story. In fact, they are always looking forward to what happens next. However, if they read it again, they are likely to know happen in the story, thereby being more focus on the thoughts and actions of each character. Knowing the results of these, they tend to find them smart or ridiculous or sorrowful, which they may not notice in the first time reading. Indeed, people might have new experiences while reading the book for another times.
On the other hand, some people may insist that reading a book again proves to be time-consuming, as people will not have chances to work on other books. As a result, they may be prevented from acquiring further knowledges. However, this is such the surface of the problem for in the second reading, as people quite understand the content, it certainly takes them purely a short time to go over that books again. Furthermore, because they tend to have deeper understanding about the stories, which means they not only know what happen but they are also possible to infer some implicit information that the books contain. Factually, the more they do this, the better their abilities to deeply analyze the information hidden in any books. Consequently, in the next times reading, they are bound to fast and deeply understand the books in the very first attempt to read. This proves to take them very short time. By and large, the opinions that reading books for the second time is a waste of time may end in collapse.
In conclusion, in-dept understanding, personal enjoyment and analyzing skill are convincing reasons for my approval. It is strongly recommended that people worldwide should take my writing into careful consideration to make appropriate decisions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, by and large, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2703.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 548.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93248175182 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59191609893 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454379562044 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 816.3 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7188576474 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230697650882 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726335995236 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675089218692 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141329885149 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730285112257 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.