Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is inevitable that education is an important policy for every country because children are the future of the country. Therefore, it raises the question the government should spend the money on the education of very young children or spend money on universities. I hold the belief that the government needs to spend the money on the young generation.
First of all, it can benefit most people by spending the money on the young people because not every citizen is willing to enter the university, but they all need to study in the elementary school. Hence, if the government put the budget on the basic stage, it can help most people. Take my country Taiwan for example. In Taiwan, our government provides the basic education for all citizens, meaning that we all need to study in school for about nine years. Even the students coming from the disadvantaged family also can enter the school to learn the basic acknowledges without paying any money. Therefore, this policy makes Taiwan have the highest literacy rate around the world.
Furthermore, expect the government, no other people or organization will offer the basic educational resources because it cannot make the profit on it. On the contrary, founding the university can make money by attracting many students desiring to have decent jobs in the future to pay the expensive tuition. On the other hands, only the government has the ability to conduct the basic education. Take China for example. At last year, the big earthquake hit China and many elementary schools collapsed. This accident made many people donate the money to build an elementary school to help the students there. At first, it seemed everything fine because the donation kept coming in so the school had enough money to find teachers and buy some fundamental stuffs for running the school. However, the donation decreases now because people start to forget this accident and the school finally shut down, proving that without the government, it is difficult to run the elementary school.
Some may argue that the government needs to put the effort in the university since the university can help students to understand the advanced knowledge, which can lead our country to a brighter future. However, I insist that if we do not cultivate the strong basic knowledge in the elementary school, how can we learn well in the university? Therefore, if the government offer enough basic educational resources, then all students have enough abilities to enter the university, which will make our country stronger.
In conclusion, I take the position that the government needs to spend money on the education of the young people because it not only can benefit more people but also is the task that only government can do.
- Your friends have the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?1. A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree soone 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The effective leader tries to make others feel they have been part of a decision? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The proper name in singular (Taiwan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
...ey. Therefore, this policy makes Taiwan have the highest literacy rate around the wo...
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
... run the elementary school. Some may argue that the government needs to put the ef...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02620087336 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64406784219 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443231441048 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.022496442 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.619047619 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233897776699 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840450305451 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938162954855 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178776496657 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142491630255 0.0645574589148 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.