Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process.
Having a leader, as we all know, for the majority of people is a crucial part of their life. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find debating about leadership sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. Similarly, I believe that the benefits of cooperation between a group`s members’ are deniable. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that collaboration is helpful in fulfilling the group`s purposes. Undoubtedly, each group is created to achieve certain goals, and obviously, people try to sign a person as a leader to fulfill this aim. What would have happened if a leader denies the group`s members and decide only by his own decision? Apparently, the group will collapse. In fact, it is essential for a group that everyone accepts the goal. Seemingly, it is necessary that each member does his part, either, and all of these tasks are on the leader`s shoulders. For instance, based on a study that has been conducted in this area, results showed that although the group`s goals are the primary reason for gathering people, everybody wants to help implicate the aims and if they are ignored they will leave the group. So, alongside with loss of members, the purpose will be lost, either.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the members’ feelings. Indeed, during the cooperation that happened in the decision-making process, a group`s members can communicate with each other, become familiar, and fulfill their tasks properly. Although many critics debate this opinion that the assistance of members in the decision process is unnecessary and it should be a high-level employee`s task, an increasing number of the successful group with the collaborative viewpoints show a different approach. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I attended a group at the university to provide a project. Unfortunately, we had a self-centered leader, and we did not have any specific role in the decisions he made about the project. Despite the fact that we did the best, we never could talk to him about our ideas about the project, so we had never been successful in that project, and considering the efforts, we showed it was not pleasant.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that for a successful leader, it is crucial to get assistance from his members both for the existence of the group and for productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence of the group and for productivity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, may, similarly, so, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17056074766 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07933909187 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53738317757 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8186560629 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.380952381 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182711030755 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572010856199 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926391893375 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123463096939 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069350330484 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.