Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It goes without saying that from ancient times to this contemporary modern time, teachers have played a leading role in every society. They have been striving to educate children having been supposed to attend the society. As technology has been developing at the galloping rate, the social status of teachers has been affected considerably. The controversial question which arises here whether or not teachers were respected and valued more in the past in comparison to current time. Taking the recent studies into account, it seems as if people appreciated teachers more in the past.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that becoming a teacher was an arduous job in the past and astute individual with high possibilities and facilities could reach this purpose. To put in other words, most of people made living raising crops and livestock in the past community and there were a few people developed interest in becoming a teacher due to lack of abilities and facilities. As a result, teachers could easily set themselves apart from crowd and had very high social position in society, which led to gaining respect from others. While in today’s world, everyone has at least one teacher in their social circle. An example can drive this notion home. My grandfather, born in rich family, mentioned that there was no teacher in their small city to teach them and they had to travel long distance to neighboring city to be educated. Having finished his high school with high GPA, he made big decision to become a teacher since in their extended family, rarely did someone go out of the family business. After finishing his study, not only his family but also fellow-citizen praised and admired him because of his significant accomplishment as a teacher before that no one could obtain. Hence, as being a teacher was a demanding occupation in the past society, people held teachers in high regard.
The second noteworthy point is that the advent of computer technology which has revolutionized the world of education has made teachers’ role pale by comparing with the past. To be more specific, computer technology along with internet introduce new notions to the world of education such as distance learning, online classes, and virtual classes. There are more and more students participating in such classes instead of entering physical classes where teachers are and consequently, individuals have been valuing teachers less and less. So, had there been these innovative technologies in the past, people may not have praised teachers to such extent.
In conclusion, having aforementioned reasons and examples into account, one can infer that teachers were held in high regard. Because, not only was being teacher a challenging career but also there were no novel technologies such as computer making teachers’ role less important in community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ontroversial question which arises here whether or not teachers were respected and valued more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...ch this purpose. To put in other words, most of people made living raising crops and livestock...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos; role less important in community.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, so, while, apart from, at least, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15665236052 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80554840997 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527896995708 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9085947102 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.15 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214883333721 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718680578861 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512718580416 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145011739932 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181232126496 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.