Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It goes without saying that teachers have been considered as one the most important building blocks of a society either in an ancient times or in contemporary periods. While some people assumes that teachers were highly appreciated and respected in the previous times, others stand at the other side of the continuum, believing that nowadays they are more valued compared to the past. Personally speaking, I hold the view that teachers and instructors used to be appreciated and valued in the past more than today. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, being the one and only source of information in the previous times, teachers were highly respected by the society. It is no secret to anyone that from ancient times and even to the past few decades, teachers and instructors were the only treasures of knowledge and wisdom. People could not have gained the necessary and required information they want, unless they asked and posed their questions to literate personalities-the teachers. However, nowadays, it is well-understood that teachers take the role of guidance not the mere source of information. Every individual is equipped with various assortments of technologies- in particular the internet- to discover their surrounding world. The absence of such astounding source of information made people to be highly dependent on the teachers. This dependency and reliance to teachers made them the cornerstone of the society and people considered them the most prestigious and valuable circles of the community. Were the past generation provided with the ample opportunities and technologies to gain knowledge and information as easily and conveniently as we do, they would not have appreciated and valued the teachers to the highest potential.
Moreover, job opportunity was scarce in the past and the one who became a teacher was considered to be highly talented. In other words, since most of people in the past followed their predecessors' occupations and few among all the dwellers of a community became a teacher, they were appreciated by peoples to a great extent. However, today every one of us has the chance and ability to become a teacher if we want to and there is not as many obstacles as there used to be. An example can drive this notion home. My grandfather, being a teacher himself, explained that how people used to exalt him merely because of being a teacher. Not only the students, but also the parents and other members of the village he worked for considered him as the most important and reliable person of their small society because he was the only teacher that instruct the students of more than eight different villages. Under such a circumstance, because of the rarity of this profession and the constant need of people to learn and become educated, they appreciate the teaching profession that is not comparable to the present time.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons and points into account, I do believe that teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past than today. Teachers used to be considered as the main and sole source of knowledge and information, the absence of technologies would even exacerbate this demand. Moreover, since not all people in the past had the chance to become a teacher themselves, they praised the teachers and commend their work to a high degree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... highly talented. In other words, since most of people in the past followed their predecessors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in other words, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2843.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 556.0 407.700716846 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11330935252 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92888104217 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44964028777 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 899.1 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3165713573 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.227272727 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328485544755 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990483595811 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892609966578 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234931972791 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367148349801 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.