Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is known that by law children must have their rights protected by the society. They are in a phase of physical, social and emotional growth. Advertisings should be directed toward a public who are able to perform critical thinking before purchase the announced product. I strongly support the idea that television advertising directed toward very young children should be prohibited. I feel this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, children, specially at this age range, are not mature enough to filter information and decide what is good or bad for them. Advertising campaigns addressed to them take advantage of the judgement absence, therefore, it is abusive and illegal. Furthermore, it is an unethical practice. Therefore, advertising of products that are consumed by the little ones should be directed toward parents, who are able to make rational decisions.
Secondly, precocious exposition to massive television advertising could foster a wide range of bad habits. For example, nutritional bad habits which can cause serious diseases such as obesity, food allergies and high levels of blood fat. The steep increase in infantile obesity numbers is a world health challenge to be surpass. Besides, noxious behaviors can be promoted such as violence and behaviors from the adult phase as eroticization.
Finally, the consumerist pressure can persuade children toward the consume of products and services. This would generate a consumer culture in kids which could stimulate values distortion, for example individualism, prejudice and competition. Furthermore, when children demand for something announced it can influence the consuming decisions of the family and cause familiar stress. Since they would throw a tantrum in order to obtain what they want.
To sum up, I strongly believe that the television advertising directed toward young kids should be prohibited. Since it is nefarious and ineffable to prematurely promote such consumer habits and culture at this age range.
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - voting system 86
- Reading passage and Lecture about UA voting system Write an essay how the professor oppose the computerized system 81
- driverless cars 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country 70
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human head 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t pressure can persuade children toward the consume of products and services. This would ge...
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f the family and cause familiar stress. Since they would throw a tantrum in order to ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53094462541 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93052821665 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3424477422 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224000783014 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680175101713 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869220897632 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133258694398 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789967820996 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.