Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
There is never a good reason to be impolite (rude) to other people.
It is universally acknowledged that moral plays a significant role in personal success and human society, hence no reason could be used to explain the immoral action. My points and example are given below.
First of all, being impolite to others can deteriorate our relationships with others. Being polite means that you give your respect to others, hence from this time other people would also likely to offer the same respect to you. So behaving politely to others can help you to gain a more extensive social group, making more available friends. What’s more, being polite in your group can also influence others to behave similarly as yours, hence everyone can show their respect to each other and accept each other more often and thus your friendship and relationship among others can also be strengthened a lot. For instance, my mother always behaves morally to other people and hence she gains a lot of acceptance and supports from others, making a wide range of friends. Additionally, due to this special atmosphere, more people would try to imitate my mother’s moral value and set my mother as an leading example. Hence more people would like to communicate with her and hence her relationship has always been wide extended. Thus being polite to others can help us get a solidified and stable relationship with others, hence contributing to personal success.
Furthermore, behaving morally is a kind of cultural tradition in every country. Hence it is compulsory for everyone to behave morally in society, or they would be excluded by both the ethics and public. For instance, in China, due to our traditional convention, more like a stereotype, behaving politely is a kind of culture in interpersonal occasions, society, and family. And those people who do not behave politely would be punished by the society. Last time one staff from my father’s firm shouted to one of his female colleagues impolitely due to some work. He was not only severely punished by my father and was also condemned by the nearby community because his behavior can hardly be accepted by many people’s values.
Admiteddly I am not saying that there is always no reason to behave impolitely to others, sometimes we may meet some guys that trouble us a lot or trap us into some dilemmas intentionally. Due to the common principle of treating people, we might reasonably behave rudely to them. But in my opinion, I suggest we human-beings can actually use more humanized behavior to treat with them, such as using the law measures or holding some public debates to punish them rather than being in line with them. So this can not only help to solve the problem but can also improve our personal status and value, making us more glamorous. Due to the limitation of the space, I am unable to give more ideas, but I believe the cause above have already proven the validity of my point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 896, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ther’s moral value and set my mother as an leading example. Hence more people woul...
^^
Line 2, column 916, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nd set my mother as an leading example. Hence more people would like to communicate w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...of cultural tradition in every country. Hence it is compulsory for everyone to behave...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87372708758 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6701115886 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50916496945 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8128931806 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.952380952 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189323099588 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628503500823 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521655398366 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103347117396 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04691835008 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.