Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the preceding decades, working has played a profound role in people’s lives. Today it is axiomatic that, people usually spend the longer part of their life working. The trade-off between working quickly and working slowly in order to prevent making mistakes has always put people in a dilemma. An unavoidable question which always has been the topic of controversy and brought about heated debates is whether working quickly and taking risk is more important than working slowly and having an impeccable outcome or not. Whether one agrees or disagrees with this depends on the lens through which one is looking. Both adherents and opponents provide substantial reasons for the option they support. As far as I am concerned it is better to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct instead of working quickly and risking making mistakes. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most paramount reasons to advocate my view point.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that working slowly and accurately reduces stress and makes individuals more satisfied, and so people can work more calmly. However, it may be earned more money by working quickly and risking, but it certainly increases the level of stress in the body that can endanger human health. People suppose that whoever works quickly will have a happier and more satisfying life than those who work slowly. Conversely, what is happening in the world and in our environment is quite different. In my own experience, I always preferred to study my lessons at a higher time in high school and university in order to read them carefully and also to have more calmness and thus get better grades than those who read fast their lessons. A recent study conducted by scientists of university of Virginia on company employees revealed that 95 percentage of employees that do their works carefully and in time enough are happy and without any stress. As a case in point, the more people are happier in society, the more the community becomes healthier and happier.
Another equally noteworthy reason supporting this opinion is that most of the political, social and economic crises happen just because people are not doing their part right and they want everything happen as fast as possible. As an example, global warming, unreliable buildings which collapse in earthquakes and so forth are the consequences of risky and slapdash works. Despite what much of the public believes, as a matter of fact, we can see how destructive the working quickly idea will be. On the other hand, since the dawn of the civilization immediate result of working quickly has always persuaded people to take risks in their work. Studies and statistics underscore the fact that the reason for economic crisis in some countries is the use of personnel who were not accurate enough in their work and tended to take risk in order to do things faster.
All the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that working quickly and risking making mistakes not only can cause serious calamities but can also endanger the human health by increasing the level of stress. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that my idea cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counterexamples might exist. Nevertheless, that was a story in a nutshell. All in all, I highly recommend that everyone, at any circumstances, carry out all their duties carefully and at the adequate time to have better society.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, as a matter of fact, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2907.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 584.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97773972603 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67666673784 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510273972603 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 906.3 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4653152105 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346387191936 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093018514423 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872573427757 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205722920795 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102411283185 0.0645574589148 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.