Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching a consensus whether people use more cars twenty years later than today or not. Some people hold conflicting ideas. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that there will be more cars present. There are several reasons that support my point of view and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.
The primary reason we have to take into consideration is that modern technology invents more convenient cars every year. It is generally believed that in past times, cars were not so available as well as too expensive. To be more exact, the car company produce a plethora of cars every year and the demand of car will be expanded more in future. My own experience is a compelling example for this. Dhaka is our capital city where it is replete with huge population. Therefore, it requires profuse transports and as a result, the rich society buys car. Thus, the number of transport is increasing day by day. It is commonly admissible that modern innovation helps to provide more car. However, having said this, it is apparent that people use more car for their daily life.
The second point that comes to mind is that buying a car is a symbol of maintaining high society. There is ample evidence suggesting that folk purchase car to show their haughty. For instance, my uncle is a business man. He has a two cars already but recently he bought a new brand car. As, he thinks that it increase his reputation and consequently, it allure other person to do the same things. Moreover, after twenty years society members will start more competition among them.
Finally, given the factors above, we may reach a conclusion that innovation and demands lead to people using more car in future.
- TPO 33 integrated 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Tpo 30 integrated writing A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: IN_PAST
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...the demand of car will be expanded more in future. My own experience is a compelling exam...
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'allures'?
...ase his reputation and consequently, it allure other person to do the same things. Mor...
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: IN_PAST
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d demands lead to people using more car in future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69281045752 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53987802702 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2490366802 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.8 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231830860292 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610386501794 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507438600116 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138947539345 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481325095032 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.