do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively when they are asked to work alone on the project.
No one can deny the importance of new methods of teaching. Many teachers prefer to assign group projects. However, others prefer to assign projects which students do independently. If I were to choose, I would choose group projects. I will explore my reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, one should take into account the fact that by assigning group projects, students are forced to work together and work in a group so they can learn the lesson better. Working in a group provide a situation in which students can enhance their knowledge because they can solve their problems by asking their co-worker. Not only their issues are solved but also they can learn their partner's problems that help their understanding. My personal experience is a compelling one and demonstrates this fact better. When I was in high school, our physics teacher used to force us working in a group. When we were solving the problems we faced a variety of issues which others faced it so we strived to solve them and if we were not able to solve them independently, we asked it from our partner. As a result, we had a deep understanding of physics and at the end of the semester, all of us passed it easily.
Another remarkable reason is that working in a group learns students' responsibility and prepare them to enter society. In contrast, if they do their projects by themselves they won't experience responsibility. Each student accepts a role in a group and tries their best to do it well without making mistakes. My notion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my experience. in the previous example, we had a final project<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre="had "></span> and each group had to make a device that demonstrated the first newton's rule. So we divided duties between the students and we had to complete our task in a given time. Had I made any mistakes, I would have donned my task again and again because I was responsible for my task and I had to finish it well.
in conclusion, I strongly believe that working in a group has many benefits for students because it learns responsibility to students. Also, it helps them to have a deep concept of the lesson and learn it better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...ly. If I were to choose, I would choose group projects. I will explore my reasons in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...profoundly influenced by my experience. in the previous example, we had a final pr...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... my task and I had to finish it well. in conclusion, I strongly believe that wor...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...deep concept of the lesson and learn it better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80156657963 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22528188913 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488250652742 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6494026947 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235697470628 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738899973589 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746841683142 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14350195941 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262940794126 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.