Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.
This is a very debatable question. If we want to come up with some suitable answers to this question, we would need to look at the pros and the cons of this question, and then draw conclusions. Even then it would not be possible to directly answer. It would depend upon the kind of lifestyle we have, educational backgrounds, individual personalities and emotional concerns as well as the situation that we are in, and so forth.
In my opinion that a zoo plays a positive role in everyone's life is an undeniable fact.
Should people realize the advantages of a zoo in their life and studies, they will ponder over it much more scrupulously.
These days, the role of a zoo in people and students' life has recently been the topic of debate among psychologist and people in our province.
I do believe that a zoo is really useful. There are a lot of different reasons with high value that support my point of view, and I would like to further illustrate a few of the most important ones in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, I want to mention one of the primary reasons that people cannot see animals in the jungle, because not only is it really costly, but also it is really dangerous for people who want to see an animal. But, a zoo can solve these problems. People and students can see some animals near without spending more time, more money. It is really safe.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that most researchers can research animals. They can research animal behavior in a zoo. But, as I mentioned in the first reason, it is really dangerous and costly if research wants to study animals in the forest. In a jungle, in the view of the fact that researchers have a lot of limitation, they can research in a zoo without any limitation.
Last but certainly not least, thinking about this question more meticulously, I would like to mention this point that some animals which are in a zoo are really dangerless. people especially children can play with them. They can close on them. They can touch them very easily. For instance, we can give a monkey an apple for eating.
Having discussed the issue from that point of view, I would rather look at it from another perspective as well. Each coin has two sides, a zoo is a kind of prison. I have a question, do you like prison? can you endure prison for researching?. Everybody will ask NO. Because freedom is one of the important needs that all human and animals try to gain it. Therefore, a zoo is a kind of jail for animals. Thanks to it, they will depress. They will disappointment alive.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Underestimating the disadvantages of a zoo in people's life is not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to understanding advantages of a zoo in our life, and can improve several aspects of personal as well as social life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ich are in a zoo are really dangerless. people especially children can play with them....
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Can
... I have a question, do you like prison? can you endure prison for researching?. Eve...
^^^
Line 10, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life, and can improve several aspects of personal as well as social life
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62476190476 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76954607969 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472380952381 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5167607723 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4117647059 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4411764706 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.53405017921 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109173156735 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321179984612 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292635268339 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504949214271 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292384537109 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.