Social behavior has been an appealing topic in the world. A minority of sociologists believe that famous entertainers and athletes should have more privacy than they have now. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with the statement.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal enjoyment. The fact is that attaining more privacy creates chances for renowned people to attain more freedom in their lives. Therefore, it is possible for them to do what they are in favor of and be away from the stress of being followed and judged by many other people. As a result, apart from their careers, famous people are bound to have their own desired lives and eventually be filled with a huge amount of satisfaction. More importantly, it cannot be denied that having more private space possesses a large probability for celebrities to obtain the feeling of being appreciated by other people. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to be provided with more motivation to try hard and put more effort into their occupations. On that ground, needless to say, well-known people tend to gradually fill the gaps in their abilities and become more skillful in their professions. Subsequently, they are certain to achieve great success in their careers and gain a lot of happiness in their lives. By and large, giving famous people more privacy plays a crucial role in improving their personal enjoyment as well as their living adequacy.
On the other hand, some people might say that giving celebrities too much privacy encourages them to do whatever they want and go far away from moral limits such as abusing drugs or violation. Accordingly, it leaves extremely bad images of celebrities in the communities. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that famous people are like other ones, they are also educated, be aware of wrong things or right things and they also have a desire to perfecting themselves. For this reason, celebrities always can have a reflection of themselves and put everything under control. Furthermore, having more privacy stands a golden chance for famous people to obtain more time for their friends and their families. In this case, it is expected to promote them to enhance their socialization with others and strengthen their relationships. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they will receive more support from other people and be capable of tackling any matters in their lives, especially in their careers. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to upgrading their personal achievement. Consequently, celebrities have a tendency to develop into more outstanding people and good images for others to imitate. Beyond any doubt, the idea that much privacy extremely decreases the images of famous people is often possible to end in collapse.
In a nutshell, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make an appropriate decision on regulating their behaviors with famous entertainers or athletes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2611.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13976377953 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90131236861 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507874015748 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6423621361 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.44 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.32 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225923567118 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694186633809 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799828789654 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173386592869 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951181381963 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.