Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

Moving from place to place is significant and inseparable part of life, hence people nowadays own at least one vehicle for moving, especially car. In this regarding, some believe that there will be fewer cars in use than today, others states that cars will be used continuously for the following decades. However, as far as I concerned, I think that the usage of cars will decrease in the next twenty years due to some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, cars cause the most severe pollution in our environment. As a matter of fact, cars are designed to operate by gas, and they release smoke through the exhaust pipe which harm the air environment. It is undeniable that air environment is the most environment for people because people’s breath happens in that conditions which needs the purity and fresh. More profoundly, appearance of many cars is the main cause of traffic jam in rush hours, wasting resources and harming the environment as well. For example, my father always goes to work by his own car. Apart from its comfortable inside, he always complains about the time and money he waste in rush hours by using cars. Therefore, he recently goes to work by subways, instead of cars. In short, using cars leads to many severe problems.

In addition, developments of others vehicles will be improved in the next decades. The improvements of technology and society make it possible for the invention of other convenient vehicles. It not only contain a large capacity but also cost less for the consumer. Another noteworthy thing that should be mentioned is that these vehicles are friendly to the environment by the available resources, such as solar energy, electricity, electrons movement. The veracity of this claim could be evaluated through a meticulous observation on the mass evidences. For instance, the appearance of electrical bus is no longer strange to people nowadays. This vehicle not only capable of transport large people at a time but also costs less money to the consumer. Moreover, electrical public buses are convenient for the user, as they go on the same route in specific hours. All in all, other vehicles will replaced the usage of cars in some nest years.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that people will use cars less often than they use todays. This is not only because its pollution but also the development of other vehicles. Therefore, people should spur into action not to use cars often.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 896, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
... hours. All in all, other vehicles will replaced the usage of cars in some nest years. ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, apart from, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93301435407 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69226248405 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514354066986 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3393957015 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.652173913 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.65217391304 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227682550715 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626879253236 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882614539398 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156153514357 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104241689264 0.0645574589148 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.