Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Benefits of broad knowledge or specialize in one specific subject have been a controversial issue in the community lately. Knowledge is a shared idea in the science world. While some people argue that specialize in one specific subject has some significant risks, others maintain that they constitute a number of undeniable advantages. Although both sides have pros and cons, I am of the opinion that it is better to have expand knowledge of many academic issues. I will elucidate the details of my support with some tangible details and examples in the following paragraphs.
Today's science people may be influenced by many things, from books to websites to their colleagues. They have more knowledge than past times people. But there is an exception. People tend to be intellectual in all aspects in order to have different point views. It contributes valuable advantages to people. For instance, they may learn more effectively than others. Because they have optional ideas.
From the last centuries to future, company has undergone a real change. People have to improve by yourself. Companies want broad knowledge from employees to use in work. They are put in productivity in order to solve the problem. Companies need this one in all time. So, they may find job easily. Nowadays, technology changes very speed via knowledge which is a power in new world.
Lastly, knowledge has significant advantages. It helps parents to interested with children. They need attention all time that some parents do not have ability to take care of children problems. If a people have interest their children, they have expanding. It compose of broad academic information. It impacts children in good way that they have opportunity in learning. For instance, some science people research that many academic results. Whether they are use different groups of people. One groups have interest and opportunity.
In conclusion, many academic subjects are impacted by many things, including, but not limited daily knowledge and they should not take care control of acknowledge. A person has the power to change knowledge level. Broad knowledge seems more effectively than outside to employee work locations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'expanded'.
Suggestion: expanded
...f the opinion that it is better to have expand knowledge of many academic issues. I wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...may learn more effectively than others. Because they have optional ideas. From the...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 261, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'composes'?
Suggestion: composes
...their children, they have expanding. It compose of broad academic information. It impac...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le research that many academic results. Whether they are use different groups of people...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79588952547 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527065527066 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1260079379 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.9677419355 100.406767564 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.3225806452 20.6045352989 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.93548387097 5.45110844103 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276201618592 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644414284834 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626915579147 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159483904306 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103253996064 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.28 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.