Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends
There are some moot points about whether it is possible to always be honest with friends or not. The question of the importance of honesty toward friends has aroused as a subject of controversy among psychologists. When it comes to my position I strongly subscribe to the point that it is possible always to be honest with friends. I have some reasons, two of which will be explicated hereunder.
The first reason worth discussing here is that the first and the foremost aspect to have a great friendship is honesty. Without being honest we can not make a strong relationship, therefore, we should try to be frank with our friends always. To be more specific, the honesty lead to friends rely on each other and believe everything in a relationship. If two friends do not trust each other the relation between them will cut very soon. As a case to the point, I vividly remember I had a friend in military service eras. In garrison, there were not any friendship between soldiers but we had a good friendship due to credence and honesty among us. We had strict rules about vacation. One day I needed to go home for my mother birthday but I was a guard that night. Consequently, my sergeant did not accept my vacation. As a result, I decided to share my problem with my best friend. The corollary of honesty among us give rise to this activity that my friend guarded instead of me and I went to my mother birthday party. My personal experience competently corroborates this point that to have great friendship it is necessary to be honest always.
By the same token, another paramount reason is that psychologically dishonesty has an adverse impact in humans mind. Thus, it is better for individuals to be honest always even in arduous situations. My personal example demonstrates this reality, I have a close friend who she was my classmate at the university. We have a corporation and work together. One day she was dishonest with me about a project and concealed something about that project. This issue led to an adverse impact on my mind and after that, I could not trust my close friends. In fact, the aftermath of this behavior weakens our relationship which stems from being dishonest in one condition. My personal experience shed some light to the point that, if someone sees any dishonesty from us it can lead to Untrustworthy forever.
In the nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons, it is better for each friendship to be honest. Because dishonesty not only weakens our relationship but also has a bad effect on our friend's mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ect of controversy among psychologists. When it comes to my position I strongly subs...
^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...should try to be frank with our friends always. To be more specific, the honesty lead ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d believe everything in a relationship. If two friends do not trust each other the...
^^
Line 2, column 1139, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...friendship it is necessary to be honest always. By the same token, another paramount ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, in fact, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75225225225 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85246836353 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.567990185 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1538461538 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192401843998 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595689828163 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710977244179 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138412355171 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071048553474 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.