Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The question is whether leadership comes naturally or not. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint may support a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that leadership comes naturally, people have borne with that skill. While, others have a conviction that you learn to be a leader as you can learn to be something else. I am unanimous with the latter group because in my view, people are able to learn everything if they put the proper effort on it. I will vastly elucidate my vantage point through two salient reasons.
To begin with, the first and most important reason is that people can became whatever they want to and if are lucky enough to be in the right place and surrounded by right people who can teach them, than it is easy for them to thrive. In addition, people that are organized and focused they always succeed in their life. Being a leader is as all masters in their fields. It is a skill that can be develop with practice and passion. For example, the recent research has shown that leaders have a higher IQ than other people. This mean that people who put a lot of effort in education and gaining wide range of knowledge can be successful. That's why, I believe that leaders are not borne like that.
Furthermore, another reason that should be considered is that leaders are people that have a wide experience and ability to solve problems, and reflect not just for their own perspective but for the beneficiary of the entire group that they are leading. If people in high professional position cannot be resilient and supportive for people how are under their supervision, then they cannot call themselves as one. To elucidate this, take my example. When, I was in university I represented my group as a leader of it. I thought that I could take that role because I felt capable to do that. My team members were very happy because our group always were successive in decisions that we made and other activities. Being a leader of the group helped me to learn and gain experience. Now ,that I work as a manager I am very confident on my work. Because of this, I think that with the experience and broad knowledge on your field everyone can become a leader.
To sum up, I strongly believe that everyone can become a leader if they want to learn and likes it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 446, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...with practice and passion. For example, a recent research has shown that leaders have a higher IQ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 637, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e range of knowledge can be successful. Thats why, I believe that leaders are not bor...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 448, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ne. To elucidate this, take my example. When I was in university I represented my gr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, for example, i think, in addition, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61313868613 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50972498887 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503649635036 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6505044075 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4347826087 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239312810469 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068219046512 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567769657385 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145487810837 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777971152319 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.