Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of whether leadership is intrinsic characteristic and people could not learn it by themselves aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that leadership comes naturally which means one cannot learn to be a leader, while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I am in agreement with the latter group. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that as a leadership people should possess some valuable skills which can be learned by education. Some skills like how to manage some tough situation, how to communicate with group members, and make a wise decision on time. All of these skills that mentioned learned by practicing, if you want to manage difficulties you can learn it by experience many hardships during your work as a leader or by studying book about others experiences, the communication skills can improve over time by interacting with many people, as time goes you learn what is the best decision in every situation. As you see none of these important features of leadership are innate abilities. Therefore, without any doubt, we can claim the leadership is not intrinsic.
In approaching this issue apart from the point to be mentioned is that there are many cases that were shy or even the introvert people and one specific event change their life to choose as a leader and many of them confess they learn this ability over time. Take the following example to illustrate this point. I had read the biography of Mirza Kuchak Chan who was a leader of the revolution that happens in my country in the 19th century. When he was an isolate and introvert child who could not connect with his peers. But as he grew up, he gained his confidence and because his friend trusts him, they choose him as the leader and finally, he became the leader of one important event in our history. As a result, if he was born as leadership, he must not the problem of socializing.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that leadership is not natural ability because some prominent skills that every leader needs to have been learned by training. Moreover, there many examples of brilliant leadership in history who was not born as a leader and became a leader over time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s the best decision in every situation. As you see none of these important feature...
^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ountry in the 19th century. When he was an isolate and introvert child who could not conne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, apart from, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77283372365 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7027526639 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498829039813 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9677270544 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.882352941 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273757401791 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796340021635 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562278569759 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159565593286 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404088089016 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.