Teachers play a pivotal role in society. Some people believe that teachers were more valuable and well worth than in new society. However, others disagree. I believe that teachers are less appreciated by society nowadays. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, Development of technology could have negative impact on this issue. When you have easy access to different kinds of technologically advanced learning means, It would lead to use them for your studying more conveniently. Therefore, teachers feel useless in this circumstances. One of my own experiences is a good case in point. I was really enjoyed to continue my study in university but it was really expensive and it was far from my hometown. Thus, our university proposed online courses for many students who were not able to attend classes.
therefore, I applied for online courses. Although these circumstances helped me and other students to follow our education without attending class but it causes teachers quiet their job because of empty classes. This example clearly illustrates that developing technology decrease the requirement of teachers. As a result, teachers have relatively less appreciated and valued in society.
Second, number of people who continue their study was less than today. thus, the less educated people, the less teacher will be teaching. This matter gives teachers a chance to be valuable and appreciate by people. For example, when my parents became teacher twenty years ago most of the people who lived in my local town knew them and admired them for their situation, but after years when the number of teachers has increased respective become less than past. This circumstances have had a negative impact on my parents’ situation because fewer people know them rather than before. This example exactly shows that enhancing the number of teachers in new society cause less appreciate of people to them.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. for two reasons. First, developing technology. Second, increasing the number of teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...at teachers were more valuable and well worth than in new society. However, others di...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly. Therefore, teachers feel useless in this circumstances. One of my own experience...
^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoyed continuing'.
Suggestion: enjoyed continuing
...s is a good case in point. I was really enjoyed to continue my study in university but it was reall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... who were not able to attend classes. therefore, I applied for online courses. Although...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ntinue their study was less than today. thus, the less educated people, the less tea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ty in the past than they were nowadays. for two reasons. First, developing technolo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25574712644 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77978441856 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531609195402 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7580299066 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.16 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.92 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226000313068 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655349282561 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974552204346 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160232397444 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977434158755 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.