Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
As the systematic education is dominated in the civilized society, the teachers possess the crucial role in it. The teachers and their freedom for expressing their belief have always been a controversial issue among the people. While some people may hold a view that the educators should feel free for saying their social or political views; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that they should be restricted to express them. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives the adherence to my idea is that the students should be able to choose their political or social perspective based on their own independent experiences. It is lucidly obvious that the teachers have a substantial impact on the students; besides, the social or political views should shape based upon the individual's unbiased understanding. In this condition, if an instructor presents his or her belief without the limitation, it can conveniently affect his or her students’ outlooks. Especially, if the students consider their educators as the role model, its influence will be three times more. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of students in the schools of Iran own a cogent and reliable belief toward their teachers. Moreover, based on another well-established static, nearly sixty percent of people of Iran obtain their social and political belief from their educational spans.
The next fact embraced my idea is that the discussions about these issues will overshadow the main training material. Indeed, these issues are so proliferated and chasm, there is no ultimate for them; besides, as long as the individuals observe them from various angles, the speech about them can be prolonged for the long hours. However, the classroom and its limited schedule are not responsible for this long duration. Consequently, this debate or the educational data has to put aside. Since the main function of the schools is the presentation of scientific information. The debates about the political and social issues are abortive. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject is my own experience. When I was a high school student, I was really interested in the political issue and I had a history teacher who likes to talk about the political issue too. Thus, in the majority of times, we discuss the political issue, without studying the history.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the teacher should not talk about their political and social attributes. Since they can impress students so easily; besides, the discussion about them can affect the training process negatively.
- 1.In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- tpo44 86
- 1.Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain 54
- 1.Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the educational data has to put aside. Since the main function of the schools is the...
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208897485493 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.131528046422 0.158761421928 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104448742747 0.0866891130778 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0522243713733 0.046263068375 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.073500967118 0.0685040099705 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106382978723 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0290135396518 0.0351676179071 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93240592692 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0174081237911 0.0309702414327 56% => OK
Particles: 0.00193423597679 0.00188951952338 102% => OK
Determiners: 0.127659574468 0.0887237588012 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0309477756286 0.0209618222197 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00773694390716 0.0139019557991 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2901.0 2387.08602151 122% => OK
No of words: 463.0 408.028673835 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2656587473 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399568034557 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300215982721 0.251872472559 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226781857451 0.174417080927 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159827213823 0.112833075102 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93240592692 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526997840173 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 61.8287668495 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0454545455 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6921306772 48.84282405 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.863636364 120.699889404 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.644075263715 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 51.0670528176 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.33834586466 1.45489161554 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442255000657 0.300154397459 147% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108850719508 0.103427244359 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0834929107361 0.0752933317313 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.530060225626 0.497263757937 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115712902616 0.151897553556 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175480448416 0.114077575197 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664442313513 0.0781384742642 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.491701846065 0.336927656856 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0170434797166 0.067059652881 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32456834027 0.210909579961 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679566834077 0.0618886996521 110% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.