Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Blessed are those, who keep their circle small. By the circle I mean the circle of relationships and the network of friends that we enclose in our life time. I highly recommend people to have a few number of friends over a long period of time and this idea seems not contentious to me at all. Trustworthy, better chance of getting familiar and people with specific sort of behaviors are my justifications which sound convincing for me to be in touch with smaller quantity of people.
First and for most, the level of trust is an undeniable factor that we pursue among our nearest people throughout our life. There have been innumerable friendships and relationships which are broken or devastated due to unfolded secrets. People basically find friends and in the most cases allow them to know their highly confidential secrets, which in turn, anticipate the other side to keep their mysteries by heart and not to reveal them in public or untrusted environments. These secrets range from a childhood plight or foreclosure or even relationships to family members. That is why those with wide range of friends have critical problems. They trust more people than what it seems as normal and often end up with their secrets revealed to others.
Equally important is the fact that by having not too many people in contact, we are more prone to know those specific people more and better. For example, one who has 3 friends, has a better idea of true characteristics of his/her friends in comparison to a person who contacts 20 or so people in regular basis. The number of acquaintances is an essential factor for us creating our explicit and favorite lifestyle.
Last but not least, there are some people who are afflicted with some radical negative or positive attributes. Having so many people not only can harm them but also may lead them to undergo some difficulties. In other words, one who possesses excessive views in religious aspect of life may find low quantity of people to be in touched with more helpful and more convincing. Reversely, If he/she be in closure to more relationship and more distinctive individuals with quiet different behaviors, it may trigger to insulting him/her because of his/her beliefs. Approaches of this kind for those specific people can make them more fragile and sensitive which may bring further conflicts.
In sum, I would definitely opt to have less yet with qualitative traits friends as to maintain a much happier life. Nonetheless, it seems isolating ourselves, I prefer to keep my secrets in a fewer yet confidential network.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...twork of friends that we enclose in our life time. I highly recommend people to have a fe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...me. I highly recommend people to have a few number of friends over a long period of time a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ave a few number of friends over a long period of time and this idea seems not contentious to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...with their secrets revealed to others. Equally important is the fact that by having no...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...d more convincing. Reversely, If he/she be in closure to more relationship and mor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, as to, for example, i mean, sort of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93087557604 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80647431377 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0134862572 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246791034961 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07231088451 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454148503752 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134537497721 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445640823349 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.