Do you agree or disagree? People who always criticize
others cannot be a member of a group.
Nowadays, group activity or team working has been increasing among the society and workplace to go ahead group's aim. It deniable that every group comprises a wide variety of people and personality. Some group members have an exclusive and sole personality that constantly they criticize the activity and character of other members. It seems that this behavior could have merits and disadvantages, but I feel that the demerits are outweighed. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my reasons.
The first noteworthy point to substantiate my viewpoint is that this behavior could have adverse repercussions on others. On the one hand, it could hurt our friends' feelings by criticizing straightforwardly without thinking about negative results. Some of our friends can hurt their feeling and passion or even worse, it can reduce their self-confidence. On the other hand, it is more likely that our friends would be hate and disgust by bad criticization and individuals. My example is compelling to justify my notion. As far as I remember, when I was a high school student, I participate in the school association, and I carelessly put my harsh comment on one of the member's work. As a result, she could not deal with my stiff criticize and left the group and leave that activity as far as I know. After a while, I thought that my function was very inappropriate and perhaps others want to do not a member of that group. Were I put my words and comments in less straightforward and indirect ways, she would not have that group.
Another equal note is that maybe always being criticized can impress others that I am stony-hearted and without mankind's passion. Indeed, this uncomfortable atmosphere would produce an unfriendly situation for group members and can not freely share their ideas and thoughts. As a result, it could reduce the productivity of the team and lead to unwilling circumstances. For instance, when I participate in a scientific association during university education, one of my friends almost criticizes other members and disturbs the flow of discussion. It was sort of a waste of time and feeling at that time to get away from that atmosphere. Sometimes, I had a desire that this member do not participate in the group.
To draw a comprehensive conclusion according to the reasons above, I believe that the harsh and constant criticism could hurt the feeling and function of a group participant. Even worse, It could be possible to show a hateful and cold-heart personality through continuous and direct by criticizer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aphs, I will elaborate on my reasons. The first noteworthy point to substantia...
^^
Line 4, column 556, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'sort of'.
Suggestion: sort of
...disturbs the flow of discussion. It was sort of a waste of time and feeling at that time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, while, for instance, i feel, sort of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03309692671 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10490913577 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513002364066 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2878325725 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7727272727 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231750397749 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675677548487 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06255709389 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145513075458 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459080617117 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.