do you agree or disagree? technology has made world complicated.
The question is whether that technology has caused people's life to become simple or more complicated. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that technology has made humans confused and even worse it has led them to become depressed while others have a conviction that technology has provided a wide range of merits for human beings and now they access welfare more than past. I am unanimous with the latter group, so next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, the overwhelming of majority of sociologists claim that technology has changed people's world in the positive ways. As much as 100 years ago, people were struggling with some troubles. For instance, when one of the members of family wanted to work in another country, his family could not see him or hear his sound for many years; however, the invention of telephone or internet altered this condition. Or the average of persons who were educated, were low because the universities were only located in big cities and there was not appropriate vehicle for achieving them, but nowadays due to improving facilities and new inventions, the young can travel with airplane in short times and or register in online courses. In short, all of these cases have optimized the quality of people's life and they do not need to involve themselves in complicated approaches to achieve to their goals.
In addition, technology plays a crucial role in the economic growth and industrial. In the past, most of the products had to be produced in houses. As a matter a fact, the communities were home-based economic. Since human forces were working slowly; hence, the societies did not experience any progress in the economic fields. Later, technology helped home-based activities to transfer to factories. With using of new and efficient devices and machines, products could have been created faster and faster such as producing textile. The countries could gain great progress in the exporting and importing fields and a large financial surge entered into countries. So, one should not forget that in such a country - without poverty- people never experience any difficulty.
Moreover, I think that the main reason for creating such a negative opinion about technology is that unfortunately, people employ different types of technology in the extremist ways. For instance, the young spend much time on their cell phones or internet instead of being with family. Or sometimes, when we can ride a bike to keep our air fresh, instead we prefer to use the car; therefore, the world can fill with idle people. For solving the mentioned problem, people should learn the culture of using of technology.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly disagree that technology has made our life complicated vice versa it could have improved the quality of life in throughout world. Just people, themselves, should apply technology in the right time and place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... in the economic growth and industrial. In the past, most of the products had to b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in short, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2556.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12224448898 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6762331737 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587174348697 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.908326333 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.181818182 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6818181818 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14720167561 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374540501911 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480779420552 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863597179883 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508919519631 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.