Nowadays, a lot of schools want to raise the prestige of schools and making students more interested in class. Thus, many schools choose to making a group of excellent teacher attend classes led by expert to improve their teaching skills and then back to school to teach other teachers. However, as far as I concerned, it is more important to trainning students effectively and working alone.
First of all, I believe that studying individually are more efficient than attending classes. A group usually will has a lot of debate between teachers and an expert, because different people have different ideas, when their opinions are contradictory to each other, they whould like to choose to believe themselves rather than learning from an expert, which is useless and takes time. For example, my mother is a high school teacher, and their school decide to letting them work alone, and every teacher improved a lor and formed a unique teaching style. So if a student like a teacher's teaching style, he can attend this teacher class which is beneficial for him.
In addition, maintainning the students' interest is also a very important part of learning. If a student did not like a course, his grades might not very good because he cannot interested in that, and it is hard for them to learning seriously and efficiently, even cause distraction. So if teachers can trainning in teaching effectly, students can learn better. For example, I used to hate the math and always faild on the math tests because the teaching stlyle of my math teacher is so boring, she just went through the motions. And then a new math teachers came instead of the old math teacher, who is never yells or shouts at us but always encourges when we face problems both in our life and study. When teaching us how to slove a problem, his advice is always inspiring and encouraging, I feel comfortable to talk to her because she knows her students well. Now, my math grades improved a lot.
Finally, using online materials can save school much monry. Inviting a famous expert to teach teachers is expensive, but online materials is usually free. Therefore, we can use this money to improve the infrastructure system in school such as science labs, which is appealing to students. For instance, my school once to making teachers use online materials to improve their teaching skills, after that, all of the teachers are teaching better. And our school use some money to build some new science labs, which makes us feel excited. Through this way, more people want to go to our school, and the reputation of our school also increased.
In summary, according to this concrete analysis, my opinion is that effective training is more useful than letting teachers attend classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...attending classes. A group usually will has a lot of debate between teachers and an...
^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...n teaching effectly, students can learn better. For example, I used to hate the math a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rove their teaching skills, after that, all of the teachers are teaching better. And our s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89721627409 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59435605592 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498929336188 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6638874356 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.904761905 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107716643765 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439204893257 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505751686374 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688646293253 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195791198567 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.