do you agree or not about telephone is much important than television
Before tendering my opinion I guess it is crucial to take quick glance on this argument on both sides. Some people prefer using telephone to reach their family nationwide. But others agree that television impact their life in such a good ways. In my perspective I concur with the first group of people who agree that telephone is much important than television these days. Because of numerous reasons why I subscribed that attitude to elaborate cogently in the subsequent paragraphs.
First reason coming to my mind consolidating my standpoint is telephone considered one of the most essential aspects in our life on this world. Moreover, nowadays we have un-limited access to different kind of technology with just one finger press and telephone is one of these technological devises which everyone definitely needed it in this century. Using telephone impact people’s life by such a properly way for instance, listening to the music and improve their knowledge about what’s happening all around the worlds. Many studies claimed that when the people talk to each other every day by phone or even chatting, that will give them a lot of energy, encourage, and support to get every thing done exactly as perfect.
Second reason I need to give it some attention is communication with each other by using telephone and that solely influence people's life by talking to their family, friends, and neighbors as well in any spot on this world. I agree that telephone is much easier and more convenient to use than different kind of communication devises. So, telephone has upgrade many devises on the last couple of centuries with a lot of new versions.
Additionally, we can use our telephone devises to raise our skills and talents as well. For example, I watched several videos to learn how to paint and now I’m expert of paintings on a canvas. In contrast to many people who are wasting their time by watching television and getting wrong news and that will lead to diminish their liability for improvement. Also, that will let them learning neglectful.
To put it in a brief, I strongly agree that telephone changed plethora of people’s life style by being more socialized. People can talk and chat to each other even if their overseas. In a nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded here, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...vision impact their life in such a good ways. In my perspective I concur with the fi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('properly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...phone impact people's life by such a properly way for instance, listening to the music a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perly way for instance, listening to the music and improve their knowledge about ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot embraced due to the dearth of time. .
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...embraced due to the dearth of time. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, i guess, in contrast, in fact, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04176904177 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83697354188 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555282555283 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6199085475 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193768278281 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623183951645 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877752400803 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110933196967 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735838880341 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.