Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they depend so much time on cell phone, online games and social networking website?

This is the era of modernization. New generation people are technophilic and most time spending on the surfing internet. There is no shortage debate whether advancement technology in certain areas such as mobile and internet have a negative influence on student education or positive effect on pupils study. From my vantage point, mobile phone, games and internet do not harm to children study but it helps to student education. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in following essay.
First of all, increase awareness of parents and students toward the education. People know about value of study, so they not waste time and money for doing unnecessary things. It is true that all people now busy on the surfing internet and chatting but it does not mean that children focus on game and chatting. Parents strict toward the children study, in fact, many parents not give cell phone in the exam time and study time. So, electronic gadget not harm for students education. My experience compelling this idea, in my home each family member has their own phone and laptop. But my mother gives mobile to me in evening time for only two hours. Before one month of exam, my parent's restricted to uses mobile phone, internet and also television. So, electronic gadget not obstacle for my study and I easily prepared for exam and got good grades. Accordingly, I believe that parents and children give more attention to the study, so technological object not problematic for students study.
Secondly, time spending on cell phone, games and social networking site are not wasteful but it is useful. Today, people uses internet for not only communication but also it uses for gathering huge information in specific subject. The Internet is one source in which all kinds of data are available. Books are inadequate for getting the knowledge, so internet best thing for study. Online game and video game helps to children development. Many games in which increase the children grasping power and improvement in vocabulary such as Merriam-Webster is an online game. I play this game every night which is help to me to get acquiescent to new world. Social networking site such as Facebook in which many pages useful to getting knowledge such as I join TOEFL group on Facebook. Here, people share their experience about exam and sharing material of each section. So, I access this material without buying, it saves my huge money.
However, many people claim that internet and mobile destroy the young people career because of misuse this object and distract easily from study. Still, I firm with my opinion because it depends on student how to uses this technology in good way or bad way.
In conclusion, although many people penchant that internet, online game and mobile harm to student education, I believe that technological gadget such as video game, communication site and cell phone bring huge benefits for children study because children understand their education value so they do not misuse this object and also many helpful applications, games, and site contributes the plentiful knowledge and information for pupil.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'internet the best'.
Suggestion: internet the best
...nadequate for getting the knowledge, so internet best thing for study. Online game and video ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2615.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03853564547 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65331701437 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456647398844 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6826047359 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3928571429 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5357142857 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207156011266 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600045857494 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613661710679 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122802190275 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530077606249 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.