If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend which of the following will you choose Why 1 Find a roommate to share a room 2 Do not buy the latest mobile phone Buy new technological devices less frequently 3 Buy cheap foods and

Essay topics:

If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why?
1. Find a roommate to share a room.
2. Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy new technological devices less frequently.
3. Buy cheap foods and cook home (do not often eat outside).

In today's fast-pace and money-oriented world, money plays a vital role in life and orienting people's thoughts. Throughout the history, money helps people triumph over obstacles and achieves success. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether it is good having a roommate and share many things with each other in order to reduce expenses or otherwise. Some people believe that, taking an acceptable roommate can help a person to make progress and also decrease costs, whereas others disagree. I am of the opinion that; the more you know a person and opt for your roommate, the more can save money and make progress for some reasons. In ensuing lines, I will address the most discernible reasons.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that, taking a good roommate, not only help you to save money e.g., the rant of the room would be half and the cost of water and electricity would be decrease, but also leads to flourishing in life and study. In fact, when a person chose a person as a roommate he/she would be able to share information and help each other to progress and save money in person's life. Take a personal experience as an example, back to when I was in university, in my last legal year of study; due to I could not have done my study, I had to stay one more year to complete my master's thesis. Therefore, the university had increased in costs of mine, for instance, the dormitory costs, food cots, etc. It was really more than my ability to afford them, so I had to take a roommate in order to reduce my expenses. I had chosen a person of my faculty i.e., physics, we faced each other prior to we became roommate. He seemed to a good person and very astute. Consequently, by doing this work, I could decrease my costs and because of our same field of study we could have shared information and had substantial conversation concerning physics subsequent we could have made big progress. As you can see, taking a good roommate, one can decrease expenses and flourish in study.

Another noteworthy aspect that should be reflected in this explanation is that, having a good roommate, one can have an exciting time with each other. one of my friends, for instance, taking a nice roommate, he was very kind and in love with climbing and spending his leisure time outside and in nature. Thus, my friend and his friend, always went out and creating a remarkable time with each other, for example, they went museum, mountain, jungle, and so on.

In light of these crucial reasons, I have strictly come to believe that, taking an acceptable roommate not only can reduce costs and make progress, but also can create exciting time with each other

Average: 7.8 (4 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... have an exciting time with each other. one of my friends, for instance, taking a n...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, e.g., first, if, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in fact, you know

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68577494692 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57360749493 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486199575372 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.654893956 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.157894737 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7894736842 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800431420024 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288082750614 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270779050767 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514152485225 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215974273788 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.