In the hipotetical scenario of me being an employer, the requirements that the workers would have to had would depend on which type of work we are talking about. If it was a very sofisticated work were the employee would have a great responsibility I would prefere to hire an experienced worker at a higher salary. On the other hand, if the type of work to be done didn´t require much either expertise nor responsability and almost anybody could do it, I would prefere to hire an inexperienced worker at a lower salary. Likewise I could save some money to double the workforce. In the following paragraphs I will present some real life examples where this can be applied.
In an high-tech company, like microsoft or in NASA, it is expected to the workers (programers and engineers, e.g.) to have a strong academic education and to have a great experience where it can be prove that they are fit to the job, since we are dealing with very high demanding jobs, regarding expertise, knowledge and responsability. Thus it suitable to pay an extra money for these proven experts, in order to expect a good job. On the other hand, in other companys that focus on service delivery, like cleaning companies, where it doesn´t requires much of an expertise of the workers and almost anybody can do it, it´s all about keeping the costs down while maintaning a good service. In this case, hiring an inexperienced worker at a lower salary would be best suited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hich type of work we are talking about. If it was a very sofisticated work were th...
^^
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much either expertise nor responsability and almost anybody could do it, I would ...
^^
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...inexperienced worker at a lower salary. Likewise I could save some money to double the w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...examples where this can be applied. In an high-tech company, like microsoft or in...
^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...xpertise, knowledge and responsability. Thus it suitable to pay an extra money for t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'extra money'.
Suggestion: extra money
...responsability. Thus it suitable to pay an extra money for these proven experts, in order to e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, while, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 254.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75590551181 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87664640688 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55905511811 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.6609630591 48.9658058833 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334846512533 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154624835815 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138344274543 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270641302189 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396274765816 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.