To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for
university professors.
Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities ought to spend more salary than other items for improving the quality of education has received a great deal of attention from university managers and education experts. Although some may say that universities had better spend money for increasing laboratory and library equipment for improving the quality of education; I, as well as many others, believe the university must pay high salaries to professors because they need to focus on education, transfer acknowledges to people, and absorb professional professors.
First of all, an important reason for spending more money for professors is that they have a crucial role in transferring acknowledge to students in educational systems. In all universities, professors have duties to teach students all lessons. In most majors, only expert professors can transfer accurate and entire information to students. In this situation, if professors do not have adequate motivation for teaching lessons in the best way, students would not learn their lessons completely, and the level of the students will decrease; indeed, the quality of education also decrease. So, by increasing the salary of professors, the university can make enthusiastic teachers for teaching in the best ways and increasing universities rank.
Another reason for the importance of investigating more money in professors' salaries is that professional and well-known professors require high salaries. All around the world, high-rank professors demand high salaries for teaching and working at the university. All universities need professional teachers instead of high equipment and facilities for increasing educational rank. If the university has high technology laboratories or has a library with a lot of books without expert professors, they cannot use this equipment in the best way. Hence, universities need to absorb well-known teachers by allocating high salaries.
Finally, it is occasionally said that universities must investigate more money on professors' salary because professors must put all attention and focus to teach lessons in the best ways. When teachers only work at the university, they put all their energy and concentration for transfer all information and acknowledge it to the students. Furthermore, because they do not need to select a second job for earning more money, they have been allocating all their time to the University for searching for new technology and information for increasing the quality of education. This purpose only achieves by assigning high salaries to professors.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that universities should pay high salaries to professors for improving the quality of education chiefly due to professors need to focus on education, transfer acknowledge, and absorb professional professors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 39, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... Over the past few years, the issue of whether or not universities ought to spend more salary...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ate and entire information to students. In this situation, if professors do not ha...
^^
Line 10, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ersities must investigate more money on professors salary because professors must put all ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65603644647 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16991810934 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437357630979 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7871285641 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.058823529 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8235294118 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505557990223 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178443892318 0.076458572812 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11760696946 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339294806372 0.150856017488 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938360685627 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.